[The Korea Times] Korea must balance immediate gains with long-term innovation

By Simon Lee

In the rapidly evolving digital landscape, South Korea stands at a crucial juncture. As the nation considers new regulatory measures to address the growing influence of digital platforms, it is vital to carefully weigh the potential long-term impacts of these decisions. While the desire to ensure fair competition and protect consumers is understandable, we respectfully suggest that the Korean government adopt a market-based approach that prioritizes innovation, consumer choice and the country’s continued leadership in global technology.

Some governments, such as those in the European Union, have quick wins by implementing regulations that seem to open up platforms or dismantle walled gardens. However, it is worth noting that EU countries are not at the forefront of developing consumer technology. These short-sighted measures may have unintended consequences, especially in a sector propelled by rapid technological advancements. For instance, artificial intelligence (AI) is set to revolutionize the tech industry in unpredictable ways, potentially requiring certain levels of platform control to ensure authenticity and security. Prematurely forcing these systems to open up could stifle innovation and slow the adoption of transformative technologies like AI, ultimately limiting the options and benefits available to consumers.

A look at the history of mobile operating systems provides valuable insights into how market-driven competition can serve consumer interests. Despite Apple’s iOS being a closed system, its competition with Google’s Android has spurred continuous innovation, lowered prices and improved service quality. This rivalry has expanded consumer choice, driving the widespread adoption of smartphones and making advanced technology accessible to millions. The ongoing decline in mobile phone prices, even as features and capabilities have expanded, illustrates that a competitive market can effectively safeguard consumer interests without the need for heavy-handed regulation.

While regulation plays a role in protecting markets, it must remain targeted and focused on preventing clear abuses, such as bureaucracy and red tape, rather than imposing broad, sweeping rules that could stifle the market’s dynamism. Overregulation risks undermining the creativity and innovation that have positioned South Korea as a global leader in technology. Conversely, a market-based approach allows for a diverse range of solutions to emerge organically, driven by the innovation of market participants. This environment enables both large and small players to innovate and thrive, and consumers to benefit.

Instead of mandating the opening of platforms or imposing restrictive measures, the focus should be on enhancing transparency and ensuring fair practices. By requiring platforms to clearly communicate their terms of service, data usage policies and pricing models, consumers can make informed decisions that best meet their needs. Fostering a competitive environment where multiple platforms and technologies can coexist and compete will also encourage innovation and drive further progress in the digital economy.

Moreover, Seoul’s status as a technological powerhouse presents a unique opportunity to lead by example. By embracing a market-based stance, Korea can continue to drive global innovation, showing how a balanced approach to regulation can cultivate a dynamic, competitive and consumer-focused tech sector.

The Korean government should consider the long-term implications of its regulatory strategy for digital platforms. A balanced market with a minimalist regulatory framework will bolster South Korea’s position as a global leader in technology. By prioritizing competition and innovation over restrictive measures, South Korea has the chance to set a global benchmark for effectively regulating digital markets while safeguarding consumer welfare.

Policymakers should seize this opportunity to lead by example on the world stage.

Simon Lee is policy fellow at the Consumer Choice Center.

기사 링크: https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/opinion/2024/09/137_382401.html